Sunday, July 21, 2019

A voice for the Indian Union from Bangla!*




“Democracy does not merely mean majority rule. It means, fundamentally, also recognizing, sanctifying and safeguarding minority rights and even minority sentiments.”
-         C. N. Annadurai a, in the Council of States, May 1963.1

When we move out of our country, we understand more about our country. In the same way, in the Indian Union, we understand more about our State when we move out of it.

I completed my school and college education from Tamilnadu. In a work place filled with Bengalis, a single question was asked to me in different formats at different occasions. All were due to the image that I’m from Tamilnadu. Since I didn’t stayed outside Tamilnadu for more than five months, I never got a chance to see the Delhi empires power in anybody’s fingertips or eyes. When I saw for the first time I was scared, shattered, stammered and even hurt emotionally. Following are the paths that led me to the answers.

1

A conflagration starts from a small spark. That day also it started in the same way. “Why you Tamils are not learning Hindi?” I responded “we don’t feel it is necessary” then the ball came back, “Tamilians are arrogant, if we speak in Hindi in Tamilnadu, they will respond in an arrogant way”

I replied. Answers created questions. Questions created new answers. The first floor of the building started shaking. Then the second floor. Later, the entire building. When the situation became out of control, it costed few seniors and an officer to bring things back to normal. There was no bloodshed.

2

This time I’m a wounded snake.

“I don’t feel it’s necessary. There is not much use for a south Indian on learning Hindi”

“If somebody comes from north India you can answer them easily na?”

“For that, we have English in common. Am I need to prepare myself to answer someone who is coming from north India? Don’t he learn the region's language?"

“Hindi is our national language. So you should learn it”

“Okay, since Hockey is our national game, will you ask everyone to learn to play?”

Starting from “this is illogical man” words and hydrogen bombs are started flowing through. Then I realized that he is also a wounded snake.

I ended up by saying “Not only Hindi, I will learn any language only if I want to”

3

This time I and another fellow young Bengali was trying to invent fire on this discussion. That time another one tried to leave the place saying “These Tamils always promotes Tamil” then I stopped and conducted a Nano-lecture on who taught me all those.

·         
Whenever I struggled in front of a question he only stood in support for me.

He only tapped my shoulder and asked me, “Thambee… Keep aside of reading me, have you ever read Anna?”

“Have you ever thought, why in the Indian Union, non-Hindi people are always obliged to answer questions related to language and culture?”

He only taught me that, why that lie - Hindi is the National language of the Union, is repeatedly spelled out even by Ministers.2

He only explained to me, how Delhi is becoming an empire instead of a federal capital.

He was the one who taught me the difference between India and the Indian Union, Central Government and Union Government, Local language and Regional language, Unity and Uniformity.

He only explained to me why I didn't understand those words ‘Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan' even though they are written in my mother tongue.

He only said to me when talking about 1965, India - Pakistan war is not the one should come to your mind, but the war for Linguistic Equality.3

He only made me to realize, after 1965 why there is no national parties headquartered in Delhi couldn’t come to power in Tamilnadu.

He only taught me the reason behind why someone needs to explain there are many other cinemas other than Bollywood.4

He only explained to me, when the constitution says all are equal, who gave the power to someone to stretch his finger and ask the other citizen “why you did not learn this language?”

He only taught me why everyone in the Union should promote their mother tongue.

He only taught me, it is not necessary to treat a language a bit more or less compared to mother tongue in the name of any -ism.



And he is Garga Chatterjee. One who continuously criticizes and writes about federal structure, language policies of the Union. One who not only writes about the Hindi dominance in the Union but also the dominance exhibited by his own mother tongue Bangla, in the states Manipur and Tripura. Not only writes, but reaches the road to claim the linguistic rights of his people, Argue one to one when seeing the violation of language policies in the Union government offices, talks not only for Bengali people but for all the non-Hindi people, for the Indian Union. He claims people’s right not only by quoting the constitution, sometimes exceeds its boundary as a man who is driven by the inner voice of moral sense. Here who ignores the voice from justice and the moral questions it raises?

It's a story of a Bengali himself became an answer to the questions raised by Bengalis. This article tries to find answers for those questions through his writings. Hence, in this piece, Garga’s contribution is more than mine.

I’m thankful to the Bengalis, Kannadigas and Malayalees who came up with questions at different occasions. Especially to Sujai P T, for giving important suggestions after reading the first draft.

Hindi, not our national language

It is one of the Official languages. Another one is English. In practice, if something exists as a national language, there must be some description of that in the constitution of any country. But in our constitution, there is no word about National language. Even then, this lie has been repeatedly said. Why?

Let’s have a look at the two incidents happened in 2018.

1.      When the decision of conducting CTET examination second paper only in English, Hindi and in Sanskrit created a row, Union minister came forward and said CTET examination will be conducted in all Indian languages (20) as was being done earlier.5

2.      When IRCTC’s new ticket booking interface in English carried Hindi during auto-suggestion of station names invited opposition from the people, it has been converted to suggest place names only in English.6, 7

When there is provision to speak in parliament with 22 languages (prior request needed to use any other Indian language other than Hindi) what is the need for asking mandatory knowledge on Hindi or Sanskrit for non-Hindi or non-Sanskrit teachers? And how that mandate got vanished when it created a row? Does it mean that it is unconstitutional to set in such a way by default? The majority of the non-Hindi people should stand up for their rights even after the independence? Is independence does not means that equal rights and equal opportunities?

On hearing the above two, one can respond in two ways: Opposing or Ignoring. Opposing only brought the constitutional right for the non-Hindi people. But this ignorance and the silence, how do they come? It’s a self-compromising explanation comes from within – ‘Hindi is our National language, that’s why they are making it mandatory. We don’t have any right to claim.’ This is all because of the belief, Hindi is our National language.

This is how a truth which can easily found by a simple web search we believe even after Ph.D. There is a history behind not making Hindi as the national language or the sole official language.  When there are steps taken to make Hindi as a national language in 1965, there is agitation spread everywhere in the non-Hindi states starting from Tamilnadu. Hundreds of them given their life as a price for the linguistic right of their children. This was no minor affair and was reported extensively for many days across the world, in the NewYork Times, Chicago Tribune, Time magazine and elsewhere.3

Even now there are demands to make Hindi as the National language. Courts rejecting the same by quoting the constitution.8 what more?! Those who utter the constitutional truth – Hindi is not a national language – filed with a case against them.9

Regionalism and Nationalism

Whenever this kind of fundamental right related questions erupts they have been labelled as who speaks Regionalism/Sectarianism/Secessionism or Anti-national. Raising questions against the government and its policies does not mean that they are against the nation. In fact, our constitution not only allows the questions/statements against the representatives, government(s) and its policies, it does allow voices against the constitution itself. Whatever the voice is, it should be evaluated only based upon how much debate it creates, for whose welfare it speaks, whatever it is opposing whether it is standing for the justice or not.
Some of them links this ‘One country - One language’ policy with patriotism. Patriotism does not come from speaking the same language, but it is more of a feeling beyond language. During the freedom struggle, there were many languages than now. Even then they fought together and attained freedom. 

Unity cannot be attained by speaking a language.  There is a belief that, George Bernard Shaw once said, The United States and Great Britain are two countries separated by a common language.

There is nothing wrong about the statement, ‘Having a common language for a country is good.’ But, It should be attained naturally and not by imposing or by giving privileges. In that sense, the Indian Union needs time. In the present scenario that is good for whom? If we carefully look at who is in support of this ‘One country - One language’ policy, they are the Hindi knowing people not by their choice, not by their self-determination but by their birth which is purely accidental or by the imposed educational system in their childhood during which, they can’t even make choice of their own on their medium of instruction or the language to learn. They are first class citizens, they will be loyal to the policies which do the favour to them.

In our school days, we heard about ‘Unity in Diversity’ and ‘Pluralism’ which are the identity and pride of the Union. Even though we are different in language and culture, we are setting up an example that, the world with different communities can live in harmony. Then how come acting in support of diversity and against the dominance of a single language becomes secessionism or antinational?  Instead ‘One country - One language’ policy is the one against diversity.

And here, why that nationalism/patriotism always expected from citizen to government(s) and not in the other way around.  Nation means people, nationalism means treating them equally. If the term Nationalism is used to treat citizens unequally means, to supress minorities means, to supress different opinion means, to establish cultural oppression means, to take off opportunities of a non-Hindi speaker means, to establish dominance means, to establish one culture – one language means then it should be the first thing to be kicked out from the subcontinent.  

Tamil - Hindi

The one to one theory between Tamil and Hindi is itself wrong. What kind of image it creates means,
1.      Tamils are not only opposing making Hindi as the national language, in addition, they want Tamil to be the national language of the Union.

2.      Other than Tamils no other ethnic group opposes the moves to make Hindi as the national language of the Union.
Both are wrong.

Tamils don’t want Tamil alone to be the national language; they expect all languages to be given equal status. Not only Tamils, but those who are fighting for linguistic equality also opposes Hindi imposition and not Hindi.10

In Tamilnadu, Hindi is not taught only in government schools. Those who are interested can learn many of the training centers outside. For example, Dakshina Bharat Hindi Prachar Sabha which is founded to spread Hindi across the non-Hindi people of the Union has more number of educators (10709) in Tamilnadu compared to the total number of educators in other four south Indian states (3787).11

Tamils have no hatred towards Hindi. They also listen to Lata Mangeshkar and Begum Akhtar. They also read Nirmal Verma.

Why oppose Hindi imposition?

“The official language of the Union shall be in Devanagari script.” – says section 343(1) of the constitution, means Hindi in Devanagari script. Since it talks about writing script, it's evident that the concept of official language is only for communication through written media in government sectors. There is no relation between the official language and what the public speaks. Official language doesn't hold status equivalent to national language. It's a mere arrangement made in order to avoid confusion in governance.12

We don’t have any problem in whatever the language they use inside the office. But when it comes to the communication with people they should convey in the language people can understand. But the ground status here is, treating the people unequally based on a language which is suggested for using only for documentation purposes.
The renewed language policies of the government forwarded by the president on 27th April 1960 states the following,
“In the opinion of the Committee, local offices of the Central Government departments should use Hindi for their internal working and the respective regional languages in their public dealings in the respective regions.
In formulating the plan for the progressive use of Hindi in addition to English in their local offices, the Central Government Departments should keep in view the need for providing facilities to the local public by making available to them forms and departmental literature for their use in the regional languages in as large measure as practicable.”13

As far as I know, in Indian Union, except Maharashtra – that too by the compulsion of State government – nowhere this rule is followed. For example, a job vacancy notification for RBI published in a Malayalam daily will not hold any single word either in Malayalam or in English.14 If you go for a Union government office in Thiruvananthapuram, the receptionist (if he/she from a Hindi speaking state) will start talking in Hindi instead of Malayalam or English. In such cases how people can ask for their need and get it done without difficulties? What is the reason for ignorance behind this part of the constitution among those who impose Hindi by quoting the constitution?

First, Second and Third class citizens

We learn from people in power. A student will acquire the sense of equality by seeing how his/her teachers and family head treats the fellow members. When the government treats its citizens equally, they also grow with that sense. But here in the Indian Union, there is no chance for that. That’s why one citizen insulting other just because for not knowing a language. That’s why he is stretching the finger and asking “why you didn’t learn this language?”

Let’s see an example to know how a citizen in the Union understands himself. If somebody from Chennai writes a letter to correct the spelling of his name in PAN card means, he’ll receive a letter printed both Hindi and in English.15 If he is a Hindi knowing citizen, he’ll read the answer in his mother tongue: first-class citizen. If he is educated, English learned citizen means, he’ll read the letter in his second/third language (there is no assurance that he can understand that completely): second class citizen. If he knows only Tamil means (you can’t write a letter in any Indian language other than Hindi) he can’t read that letter: third class citizen.

In this way, we can show thousands of examples which gives struggles for a non-Hindi speaker in the Union.2

Lifesaving safety instructions in a flight from Hyderabad to Chennai will be in Hindi or English. Will not be in either Telugu or Tamil. (But British Airways flight from Chennai to London will have the announcement in Tamil and English)

Cannot apply for a passport in any other Indian language other than Hindi. (But the US embassy in the Union use regional languages)

Cannot expect the Union government schemes will be named in any other Indian language or translated to the language of the region.

Cannot expect Delhi centred autonomous bodies like Election Commission of India to give advertisement in the region's language in movie theatres.16

Cannot expect public sector banks will use trilingual policies in their Challans, ATMs and CDMs (as per the RBI directions) in the non-Hindi speaking states.

Cannot expect ironies like reservations chart in a train moving from Thiruvananthapuram to Chennai to be prepared either in Malayalam or Tamil. (Now reservation charts are not pasted)

Cannot expect to can sign in your mother tongue when applying for Union government jobs like railways.17

I will let your concise to decide what would have happened if Hindi became the national language or sole official language of the Union.

Union government(s) and language census

An important thing repeated in the discussions about Hindi is, ‘It is spoken by the majority (less than 50%) of the people.’ Let’s see how.

Professor Ganesh N. Devyb who led the People's Linguistic Survey of India in 2010, writes the following: During the 1961 census that languages in the country were a total of 1,652. Using ill-founded logic, this figure was pegged at only 109, in the 1971 Census. During the 2011 census, citizens submitted 19,569 names of mother tongues. A total of 1,369 names — technically called “labels” — were picked as “being names of languages”. In addition to the 1,369 “mother tongue” names shortlisted, there were 1,474 other mother tongue names. These were placed under the generic label “Others”. The 1,369 have been grouped further under a total of 121 “group labels”, which have been presented as “Languages”. Of these, 22 are languages included in the Eighth Schedule of the Constitution, called “Scheduled Languages”. The remainder, 99, are “Non-scheduled Languages”.18

An analysis shows that most of the groupings are forced. For instance, under the heading “Hindi”, there are nearly 60 other languages.19 Bhojpuri (spoken by more than 5 crore people, and with its own cinema, theatre, literature, vocabulary, and style) comes under "Hindi”. Under Hindi too is the nearly 3 crore population from Rajasthan with its own independent languages. There are demands to add many languages in the eighth schedule and there is fear too, that will result in a decrease of Hindi speakers.20

Propagation of Sanskrit, a language spoken by all of 25,000 Indians as per Census 2011, has been another area of focus of the Union government. Back in 2014, over 70,000 students across 500 Kendriya Vidyalayas were asked to switch from German to Sanskrit as their third language of study. In 2016, the Union HRD ministry asked all IITs and IIMs to offer elective language courses in Sanskrit.21 270 crores sanctioned for Sanskrit Prachar Sabha in the financial year 2014-2015 and when it not even submitted its audit at the end, 740 crores were sanctioned for the consecutive year.40 We have no problem in promoting a language in an extinct stage. There are many languages in the Union which holds situation as equal to or worse than Sanskrit. Searching what has been done to promote those languages by the Union government resulted in an empty hand.

A Committee was set up in September 2003, under the Chairmanship of Shri Sitakant Mohapatra to evolve a set of objective criteria for inclusion of more languages in the Eighth Schedule to the Constitution of India. The Committee submitted its report in 2004 asking to include 38 languages. Up to now, there is no action taken by the Union government(s).22

There is a hidden truth in Hindi dominance in the Hindi belt over other Indian languages and south India, which doesn’t hold any dominant language among the Dravidian languages.

Hindi imposition in Education

We’ll start from Primary education. Learning in the mother tongue is good23 and it’s a birth right. Most of us are thinking in our mother tongue. Learning in a language spoken inside the home and society results in developed cognitive function. But in fact, language policies of the Union affects Child education in many ways.

In the movie 'Newton' released in 2017, one of the main character asks the school teacher, "these children don't know Hindi?” in response she will tell, “They know only Gondi, but their textbooks are in Hindi” There is a dictionary for Gondi available online, but their books are not in their language.

Because of this kind of policies, dropout rate of children in tribal areas is increasing in number, one of the Delhi University professors adds. Even today, in Orissa, if 100 tribal children were taken inside, 75-80 of them drops out of the school before reaching 8th standard.15

Union government established a council (Council for Scientific and Technical Terminology - CSTT) to create new terminologies for Hindi to use in the offices and educational institutions. As per the directions from the court (later it became a problem for judge’s themselves) 24 this council derives words from Sanskrit. Because of this, the children who born in Hindi belt also gets affected.

For example, ‘Pani’ derived from Hindustani, is the common word used for water in Hindi. But instead of that the word ‘Jal’ used in textbooks. When there is a difference between ‘Hindi they speak’ and ‘Hindi they learn’ the effects it will create won’t be a desirable one.

In 2017, the committee set for giving recommendations for official language policies came up with some recommendations25 (including ministers and president should use only Hindi to address the people and Candidates willing to get employed in Central Government Offices to pass Hindi competitive exam in accordance with the post.) which were signed by the President of the Union. One among them,

The Committee is of the opinion that Scientific/Research and other Research institutions spend a large amount on purchase of books. If this exemption continues the major portion of the library budget will be spent on the purchase of the journals and reference books and will adversely affect the purchase of Hindi books. This will be a deviation from the original purpose. Therefore, clear orders in this regard may be issued that in any case 50% out of the total amount for purchase of books should be used for the purchase of Hindi books. The Committee recommends that in the offices where library budget is not allocated, a minimum 1% of the Office Expenditure Head may be spent on the purchase of Hindi books. It is also to be kept in mind that 50% of the total library budget or 1% of the total Office Expenditure Head, whichever is more, may be spent on the purchase of Hindi books.

It recommends some more too:

1. Ministry of Human Resource Development should make serious efforts to make Hindi Language compulsory in curriculum.  

2. Ministry of Human Resource Development should work out an action plan for implementing Hindi teaching scheme in all Universities/Higher Educational Institutes and initiate the process of implementing a common law and table it before both the Houses of Parliament.

3. A proposal for making Hindi education compulsory up to Class tenth should be introduced in the Parliament.

When it comes to national level examinations, situations are even worse. When it’s come to an exam, everyone should be given equal opportunities, not only in the sense of syllabus but also in the sense of language. Either it should be in mother tongue or in the second language. Instead of that, giving opportunities for someone in their mother tongue and for others in their second language is not justice. Here, one who doesn't have Hindi as his mother tongue cannot write national level entrance exams like AIIMS, IIT-JEE and NET in her/his mother tongue.

One can ask, do we need to spend money and time for translations for a few people? Yes, we should pay the prize for justice. When civil service exam questions translated even for 25 candidates opted a language means, the same should be followed in all exams or should be conducted in a common language. In that sense, we the citizens of India should share the advantages and disadvantages equally.

English and Hindi

“English is a foreign language we should have an Indian language as a national/common language”

“You are an Indian you should support Hindi and not English which is brought by British”

You may heard this kind of funny one-liners. If I look into the life of these people who live on their policies, their patriotism will not reflect even one percent in the case of their own signature, the medium of education, products they prefer. Imposing anything inside individual right is violence. To the best of my search, none of the citizens around the world need to express his love towards the nation by learning a language.

Since English stands in support of diversity and proving Hindi alone is not the link language naturally opposition will come from Hindi imperialists. We should strongly support the claim that there should be only Indian language. But that should not be a single language like Hindi since majority can’t read and write. Hindi speakers are different from Hindi literate. It’s a Union of states separated by language.

Government is an arrangement of public representatives who are selected for serving the people. Representatives should speak the language of the people. But here a representative speaks people language when asking for vote, and once he enters into the ministry, he is asked to give public speeches in Hindi. But one who sells nuts in Kanyakumari, speaks the language of his customer. This sense will not be there for a so-called educated employee of the Union government office. In the name of nationalism and patriotism, speaking a language which the customer/people can’t understand is a complete fraudulent act.

Since English taught in 598 Navodaya schools in the Union (except Tamilnadu) by the directions from the Union governments itself I feel everyone knows the importance of it. That is the medium of instruction in the majority of the educational institutions. What is the problem in continuing English as a link/additional official language? When they are fanatic about Hindi, what is wrong if a Tamil stood up for his/hers mother tongue? What could be the better way other than upholding linguistic identity when supressed by reasoning the same?

English is not a disease left by the British. That brought Nobel prizes to our country, 26 two of them got a chance to get recommended (Kamala Das27 and Sachidhananthan28). One who studied B.Sc. in his mother toungue standing among the frontiers of Indian science means, that is only because of English.29 One who born for a fisherman in a small village in Rameswaram became the first citizen of India means, that is only because of English. They themselves live long as a metaphor for all non-Hindi speaking people.

Apart from all these, when each district has its own dialects for a language (including Hindi30) this ‘One country - One language’ policy is a nightmare.

Is there no progress without Hindi?

You may heard many saying there is no progress without Hindi. It is true that, those who know Hindi can make use of many privileges and opportunities. These are all the arrangement done to impose Hindi and not to provide justice. A language should be beneficial for the user – this became the inverse agenda in Hindi imposition. A language should attain its place among the people by entering into their daily usage, like English.

If we look in the sense of population and size, Hindi speaking states are higher in number.  But the major contribution to the Union’s GDP is from the non-Hindi states. The money they contribute to the Union and get back for their welfare schemes and during natural disasters are lesser than the demand. While Tamil Nadu and Kerala gets about 40 paise and 25 paise for every rupee they generate for the Union, Uttar Pradesh gets back 1.79 per rupee it generates.31

Apart from this, non-Hindi states are frontier in education, medicine, creating opportunities, women welfare, annihilation of caste and poverty.32 Tamilnadu which is frontier in opposing Hindi imposition holds its place among top five under any of the above category.  If Hindi brings progress why there is more migration from Hindi belt to non-Hindi states?33 The claim Hindi will be useful for living in India, is not true even in the case of people with Hindi as their mother tongue. Non-Hindi states are one of the finest ever living examples of these false claims. Improvement cannot be attained by imposing a language, it’s by creating opportunities. 

What would result by learning only Hindi by ignoring English?

We have seen three recommendations given by Official Language Implementation committee. When reading that, the above question naturally arises, Gujarat Model gives answer for this.

20% of Gujarat’s population were Patels. Among the 120 assembly members of the State, 40 were Patels. Majority of the ministers were also from the same caste. Being landlords and with this much political representation, why they protested for reservations? 34 Most importantly, when looking back, the same community protested against reservation in 1985. What happened in those 20+ years?
Individual’s salary for a Gujarati is higher when compared to a Tamilian. It is because of their longer working time or they are involved in two different jobs in a day. Gujarat has created Blue-collar jobs than White-collar jobs. Why?

Ignorance of English. In Gujarat Children starts to learn ABCD from 6th standard. ‘Pratham’ report, which analyses about the progress of primary education in the Union on yearly basis says, “Gujarat children are holding last place in handling English” This resulted in no service sectors and only manufacturing sectors and hence only Blue-collar jobs. It is mainly because in those 20+ years an entire generation is not given access to learn English up to 5th standard.35

Since these recommendations mainly influence the future of our children we should find an answer for this question: What Hindi will give for a Non-Hindi speaker which his/hers Mother tongue and English will not give? 34

Through other eyes

Once I was discussing with one of my juniors from Rajasthan, she was surprised about the designation Hindi officer in the non-Hindi states. I added “It is for assisting in the official proceedings in Hindi. We don’t have any problem with that. In fact, they are helping us in circulars violating bilingual policies.” But if you go to any of the railway stations and Union government offices in Tamilnadu, each day you will witness Tamil-Hindi-English version of a word in boards kept. Able to witness posters saying, “Thinking and speaking in Hindi will give you happiness” in the airports.14 we are yet to be converted into Indian citizens.

On another occasion, one of our guest from Japan asked a very important question: ‘How are Indians accepting a foreigner very easily?’ He has travelled to 4-5 countries. Question rose from that experience. Professor Ganesh N. Devy gives a hand here36 – “those who accept diversity have more tolerance; you see those who want to make Hindi as the national language!”9, 37 One who grown among diverse culture understand its values, respect others rights and beliefs. For him, in the Union, seeing a foreign thing out of his culture is normal.

In an event at Bharat Bhavan, I met a Kerala University professor (retired) from Italy and lives in Thiruvananthapuram. Been a part of the English department, she taught foreign language in the university. She had enough socio-cultural life experience in Kerala to point out the characteristics of Thiruvananthapuram people. She traveled around India. “The asset of India is the diversity in culture, language, food and landscape. It can be understood only by stepping out” Yes, one needs to travel, Gandhi did the same. One should not decide about language policies with mere statistics by sitting hundreds of kilometres away.

Voices from the north

To the best of my search, none of the historians from the Union were the supporters of this ‘One country – One language’ policy.

Hindi was not even a language of majority’s usage before independence – not printed in the rupee notes of East India Company’s Indian currency. In sixties, Hindi was a toddler. In 1963, C.N. Annadurai, one among the representatives of Tamilnadu in the upper house of the parliament, demanding to continue English as an additional official language of the Union and to replace the word ‘may’ with ‘shall’ in section 343 of the constitution (both the bills were passed). When the speaker of the house asked him to stop the speech when time exceeded, there were voices echoed, tables tapped in support of him to continue.1 The sound echoed that time are the sounds of the States. Because of that only Hindi is not the only official language (and it will not become). The parliament heard the same sound at the beginning of this year. If you didn't watch the video of "Tharoor, Swaraj spar over Hindi at the UN" please do watch on YouTube. They are the questions raised by him when the Union tried to make Hindi as the official language of the UN. (If Hindi became the official language of the UN, Indian Union need to spend 267 Crore per year) 38

In addition to these, there are oppositions from the people, there are articles26, 39, 40 and movies and there are actions taken by the state governments to promote languages of this land.

How about other states in the Union?

Union governments should learn from the states.

The Hindu (Thiruvananthapuram) on November 24, 2018, carried a piece in the first page: Odisha now has a lexicon for rare tribal languages (21).41

UNESCO global education monitoring report 2019 (came out in November 2018) stressed the challenges in child education by migration. The Hindu has listed what the state governments were doing. Among the states, Tamilnadu is the one which prints textbooks for the children of migrants in their language.42

Kerala and West Bengal made states language compulsory up to 10th standard.43, 44

West Bengal issued an order to make 120 prime time shows for Bengali movies.45

Kerala invited entries for state’s official song.46

Metro rail in Bengaluru removed Hindi boards on demand from the public.47

Series of demands in 2018 resulted in printing railway tickets in regional languages across 9500 stations in Tamilnadu and Kerala.48 
(Information on all Railway tickets should be provided in bilingual form so that there is no inconvenience to those knowing Hindi. – one of the recommendations by the committee set for giving recommendations for official language policies)

Kerala started to promote Malayalam worldwide and initiated literacy programs for migrants.49, 50

There are requests to make sign languages also an official language.51 
Several NGO’s joined hands and brought of the constitution in Braille.52 (The constitution written in English does not have the official translation in any other Indian languages except Hindi)

Punjab University abandoned the usage of Hindi for official purposes when demands rose from the students.53

AAI declared the announcements will be made in regional language along with English and Hindi.54

How about other countries?

If we search on the internet, we can see a lot of countries in favor of/accepting multilingualism.55 Switzerland prints passports in five languages. Srilanka which holds the population of 74.9% Sinhalese prints passports in three languages. Someone may ask, ‘Do we need to print Indian Union passports in all the scheduled languages?’ There is wrong in printing the passport for a Maharashtrian in Marathi and for Punjabis in Punjabi in addition to English.

Nigeria a country with more than 520 languages uses English alone for their official purpose. They also ruled by the British and got independence after us. They understood English is a tool to communicate with the world. They teach Regional language in all the 36 states. They are not imposing any language in the name of nationalism or they don’t ignore English. They know, in a country with different languages should have a common language which is a foreign language for all; They know, the citizens of a country should be treated equally; They know, citizens of a country should share the advantages and disadvantages equally; They know, in the name of nationalism imposing a language on the people is immoral. If anyone says they are less patriotic towards their country would anybody consider it as a wiser statement?

The path to equality

Voices for linguistic equality are continuing to echo in the Union. We witness people attaining linguistic rights on demand. There are number of organizations like CLEAR, 10 Bangla Pokkho,56 PLE Karnataka57 and Thannatchi Tamizhakam58 around the Union. The above-stated changes in different states brought by the major contribution from the above organizations. 

Among them, CLEAR, which mainly demands child education in mother tongue, linguistic equality and preservation of languages in extinct stage constitutes representatives from 40 languages of the Union.

Our problems are larger and hence the article. Language is not just a simple thing. Each word holds history of an ethnic group. Saving the language means saving fundamental right. One of the reasons that Soviet Union broke is language dominance. Bangladesh is born by claiming linguistic equality. Thousands of Tamils killed in Srilanka is because of language dominance. Each topic discussed here is the content for a separate article. I force myself to end here. It cannot be concluded because every morning I read something new to write about. We cannot come to a conclusion by discussing when having a tea or meals. But we should not stop discussing.
It is disgrace for a country where the people need to fight for their fundamental rights.

Inequality will remain until the end of this world. History is what else other than the path to equality?!

·         

*West Bengal Assembly passed a resolution to rename State as ‘Bangla’ in 26th July 2018.59



Garga Chatterjee
Brain Scientist. MBBS from Calcutta University. Ph.D. from Harvard University. Post-Doctoral research from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Assistant Professor at the Indian Statistical Institute, Kolkata, West Bengal. One of the founder members of CLEAR. He writes in the wide spectrum of topics including politics and culture in both English and Hindi. His first book published in Tamil – Your Empire and My Citizens. You can read his articles by using his name in web.           Blog: hajarduari.wordpress.com


a C. N. Annadurai
Former Chief Minister and Member of Parliament from Tamilnadu. In his speech in the Council of States on May, 1963 he elaborated the injustice in making Hindi as sole official language and importance of English.1 The arguments he made, each of the word he used, did not expired even after half century and it will not tarnish for the many years to come. Web: http://www.annavinpadaippugal.info/speech_paralumandram.htm


b Professor Ganesh N. Devy
He led the People's Linguistic Survey of India (PLSI) in 2010 and identified 780 languages in the Union. He won the 2011 Linguapax Prize for his work for the preservation of linguistic diversity. He was awarded the Sahitya Akademi Award (1993) for his book in English and returned the same in October 2015 as a mark of protest and in solidarity with other writers sensing a threat to Indian democracy, secularism and freedom of expression and "growing intolerance towards differences of opinion" Born in Maharashtra and living in Karnataka to take care of the case proceedings of M. M. Kalburgi who was shot dead in 2015.


References:
2.       What It Is Like to Use Neither Hindi Nor English In India https://caravanmagazine.in/vantage/hindi-imposition-india-discrimination
3.       Remembering 1965, forgetting 1965, celebrating 1965
4.       Peranbu -Official First Look | Mammootty, Anjali, Sadhana | Ram | Yuvan Shankar Raja |HD Promo Video
6.       ‘Your job is not to promote Hindi’: Kanyakumari Railway Users’ Association slams IRCTC https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/your-job-not-promote-hindi-kanyakumari-railway-users-association-slams-irctc-84190
7.       Hindi removed from English version of IRCTC online ticket booking portal
9.       Case filed against Raj Thackeray for insulting Hindi language
12.     Is Hindi India's National language? http://sannaloram.blogspot.com/2018/09/is-hindi-is-indias-national-language.html
13.     PRESIDENT's ORDER, 1960 http://www.rajbhasha.nic.in/en/presidents-order-1960
14.     Hindi Imposition talk - Garga Chatterjee https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uFassy4_C_A
15.     Kalachuvadu (Tamil Monthly), Vol 30, Issue 3, March 2018
22.     RAJYA SABHA, UNSTARRED QUESTION NO.2974 http://rajeev.in/?questionasked=mohapatra-committee-on-languages/
23.     Impact of Mother Tongue on Children's Learning Abilities in Early Childhood Classroom, A. V. Awopetu, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 233, 2016, 58-63.
25.     http://www.rajbhasha.nic.in/sites/default/files/cpolreport9-chapter15eng.pdf
26.     The Nobel Prize in Literature 1913 https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/literature/1913/summary/
28.     Sukumaran speech | Poet Atmanam Awards 2017
30.     Hindi Nationalism – Alok Rai, Orient Longman Limited
31.     United States of South India: Can a southern collective get us a better deal from Delhi? https://www.thenewsminute.com/article/united-states-south-india-can-southern-collective-get-us-better-deal-delhi-46501?amp
34.     Whether Tamilnadu need to protest one more for English too? http://writersamas.blogspot.com/2017/04/blog-post_60.html
36.     Andhimazhai (Tamil Monthly), October 2018.
38.     Sinthippathaith thavira veru vazhi illai, Suguna Dhivagar, Ethir Veliyeedu.
40.     We are not Hindi, Sooraj B Singh, Uyirmmai (Tamil Monthly), Issue 174, February 2018
42.     Literacy levels in rural India suffer due to migration, finds UNESCO study https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/literacy-levels-in-rural-india-suffer-due-to-migration-finds-unesco-study/article25541258.ece
43.     Kerala Government Makes Malayalam Compulsory In all Schools https://www.outlookindia.com/website/story/kerala-government-makes-malayalam-compulsory-in-all-schools/298507
54.     Civil Aviation Ministry asks airports to make public announcements in local language too https://www.thehindu.com/news/national/civil-aviation-ministry-asks-airports-to-make-public-announcements-in-local-language-too/article25834422.ece
55.     https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bilingual_sign



No comments:

Post a Comment