Wednesday, June 5, 2019

National Education Policy draft -2019 talks about English supremacy, why it refuses to talk about Hindi supremacy?


“Multilingualism and the power of language (Page 81 of NEP-2019)

What then is the reason that English is being pursued by so many in India as a medium of instruction and of conversation, when most other technologically advanced countries of the world have naturally kept their own native languages for these purposes? The answer, of course, is that, since Independence, the economic elite of India have adopted English as their language; only about 15% of the country speaks English, and this population almost entirely coincides with the economic elite (compared with, e.g. 54% of Indians who speak Hindi). Furthermore, the elite often use English (whether deliberately or inadvertently) as a test for entry into the elite class and for the jobs that they control: English is regularly used by the elite as a criterion to determine whether someone is “educated”, and perhaps most unfortunately of all, as a prerequisite for jobs - even in cases of jobs where knowledge of English is entirely irrelevant.

This sad scenario and attitude (again, it may well be inadvertent) have resulted in the marginalisation of large sections of society based on language, keeping them out of higher-paying jobs and the higher socio-economic strata. This attitude has kept the elite class and the jobs they control segregated from the economically weaker sections of society, which of course contain many hardworking, smart, high quality, highly skilled, and educated people who happen not to speak the language of the colonists and current elite. It has created an unnatural aspiration of parents for their children to concentrate on learning and speaking languages that are not their own.

We further observe that English has not become the international language that it was expected to become back in the 1960s. As already noted, most advanced countries use their own native languages as the languages of interaction and transaction, and it is suggested that India works towards the same, or its rich language and cultural heritage, along with the rich power of expression, may slowly be lost. It is also strongly recommended that interactions between people within India be conducted in languages native to India; thus Indian languages must be heavily promoted again and with new vigour

Of course, English has become an international common language in certain realms such as science and technology research, e.g. most high-level scientific journals around the world at the current time publish predominantly in English. For this reason, it is also important for children (especially those who intend to pursue scientific subjects at a postgraduate level) to become bilingual in science and to be able to communicate science fluently both in their home/local language and in English. This is in concurrence with the practice in all technologically advanced countries.

From the above, NEP-2019 talks about English supremacy but why it refuses to talk about Hindi supremacy in the Union?

We don’t know from which census data the policy draft talking about the percentage of English and Hindi speakers. But it gives us a sign to understand Hindi supremacy in the Union.

1.     First, the statement, English is the language of 15% economic elite is unbelievable. Most of the schools in the Union teach English as a second language. It is mingled with all Indian languages and hence Indians. English is not tied to elite, a non-Hindi speaker can communicate to the Union government only using English.

2.     If the whole idea is about opposing English supremacy, then why not even for context purpose Indian languages not considered as a whole? Why Hindi only highlighted as 54%? Instead if the statement be like only about 15% of the country speaks English, and this population almost entirely coincides with the economic elite (compared with, e.g. 85% of Indians who speak do not speak English).it will make the argument stronger. When it comes to Indian Union, why Hindi only comes to mind? Perfect example of Delhi centric thought!

3.     For a debate sake, if we consider this population percentage is true (and we know how this Hindi speaker’s percentage is attained1 – including Languages like Rajastani which has nearly 3 crore speakers under Hindi) we have three more sub-questions:

i.                 Here, one who doesn't have Hindi as his mother tongue cannot write national level entrance exams like AIIMS, IIT-JEE, and NET in her/his mother tongue. These exams conducted only in Hindi and English. Which means, the Union government(s) itself ignores the rest? (100-15+54=31% non-Hindi/non-English speakers)

ii.               Here, one cannot write a letter/get a letter to/from a Union government office in his/her mother tongue. Which means, the Union government operates only for the 69% Hindi and English speakers?

iii.              If the percentage is true, why can’t Union government make all languages as official languages and treat them equally as Hindi by giving opportunity for a non-Hindi speaker to write national level exams in his/her mother tongue?

4.     Draft states “English considered as a prerequisite for jobs - even in cases of jobs where knowledge of English is entirely irrelevant.” The same suits for Union government jobs and Hindi. Hindi considered as a prerequisite for some of the Union government jobs - even in cases of jobs where knowledge of Hindi is entirely irrelevant and because of that, many non-Hindi speakers are not getting through it. This attitude has kept the Hindi speakers and the jobs they control segregated from the non-Hindi speakers of society, which of course contain many hardworking, smart, high quality, highly skilled, and educated people who happen not to speak the language of the Union government. It has created an unnatural aspiration of parents for their children to concentrate on learning and speaking languages that are not their own. This was repeatedly written by Professor Garga Chatterjee.2

5.     “We further observe that English has not become the international language that it was expected to become back in the 1960s.” The same applies to Hindi and Sanskrit also. We know that Hindi has not become the majorities language that it was expected to become back in the 1960s. They were repeatedly promoted by spending an excess of tax money, majority contributed from non-Hindi states and miscalculations in census data.

6.     The draft says, “Of course, English has become an international common language in certain realms such as science and technology research, e.g. most high-level scientific journals around the world at the current time publish predominantly in English.” But what the Official language committee recommendation3, which was signed by our former President and which came to amendment says is:

The Committee is of the opinion that Scientific/Research and other Research institutions spend a large amount on purchase of books. If this exemption continues the major portion of the library budget will be spent on the purchase of the journals and reference books and will adversely affect the purchase of Hindi books. This will be a deviation from the original purpose. Therefore, clear orders in this regard may be issued that in any case 50% out of the total amount for the purchase of books should be used for the purchase of Hindi books. The Committee recommends that in the offices where library budget is not allocated, a minimum 1% of the Office Expenditure Head may be spent on the purchase of Hindi books. It is also to be kept in mind that 50% of the total library budget or 1% of the total Office Expenditure Head, whichever is more, may be spent on the purchase of Hindi books.

This reduced buying of English books/journals in the research institutions and Hindi books bought under these plan are found no readers. 

Propagation of Sanskrit is another topic. Repeatedly highlighting that, even by false claims like it will help the development of Indian languages also seen in the draft. In fact, the Union government already done much by spending lots of amount through Sanskrit Prachar Sabha and through some amendments through ministry.4 what it has done to promote/preserve other Indian languages?

When majority of the above affects the opportunities of non-Hindi speaking children, why National Education Policy draft -2019 refuses to talk about Hindi supremacy? 

References:

2.     How Hindi is becoming a hurdle for those who want to join the Army https://www.dnaindia.com/analysis/column-how-hindi-is-becoming-a-hurdle-for-those-who-want-to-join-the-army-2247911


No comments:

Post a Comment